Wedmore Estate, Islington

An Example of Municipal Housing in Islington from 1904

Part 1

The following is a summary of documents in a file on the Wessex Buildings, built between 1900 and 1904 in Holloway, Islington, by the London County Council. They cover the building of the first three blocks, their rehabilitation in the 1930s, repair and rebuilding after War Damage in 1947, and their further improvement in the 1970s, The different letters and reports follow the changes in legislation, outlook and expectations of tenants over a period of nearly a hundred years. I have not found any comparable set of documents about an Islington Housing Site of this age and think it was probably Islington’s first Council estate.

The Early History of the Area in Maps

 
Milne 1800, Land Utilisation Map

The Milne Map of 1800 was one of the very earliest Land Utilisation Maps showing how the fields were being used on that particular year. The small setion shows the Hollow Way between the hills of Islington, Highbury and Highgate. The hollowness of the area would have been far easier to see then, in the open countryside, than it is today when it is covered with houses. These were two tiny cities of London and Westminster miles away, nestling on th banks of the Thames.

In 1800 the map of Holloway shows very few houses and almost every field on this piece of the map has an ‘m’ in the corner denoting a meadow.The whole area was meadow land, supplying milk, meat, and hay to London and Westminster.

The Milne Map of 1800 was one of the very earliest Land Utilisation Maps showing how te fields were used on that particular year. The small setion shows the Hollow Way between the hills of Islington, Highbury and Highgate. The whole area was meadowland, supplying milk, meat, and hay to Londonand Westminster. These were two tiny citiesl miles away, nestling on th banks of the Thames. Almost every field has an ‘m’ in the corner enoting a meadow. There were very few houses.

1868 map of the future Wedmore Estate site

By this time the Holloway houses were advancing rapidly.

++PIECE ABOUT PEOPLE FLOODING INTO london------shortage of housing etc.

Five Per Cent Philanthropy Housing

Earlier legislaiion had attempted to house the poorer people by charitable and philanthropic means. Local almshouses for Local old people and later, the so called 'Five per cent. housing' - in which people with charitable intentions invested money in Housing Societies to build property to be rented out at low rents. They did not expect high returns on their money, but; they certainly required some. This philanthropic system had rehoused a number of people, but. could not tackle the massive problems revealed by Booth's study of London Housing. Gibson Gardens in Stoke Newington, is one example still standing.

++LINK To Gibson's gardens and back

The Booth Maps of London Poverty, 1889

A small part of the 1889 Booth Map of London Poverty

Charles Booth (not to be confused with General Booth of the Salvation Army) was a wealthy business man who refused to believe that a million Londoners lived in 'great poverty', as radical politicians claimed. He started a long survey to prove them wrong, the first really carefu1 survey of how people lived and worked. Booth divided people into eight groups H-A, but coloured in his maps in seven colours ranging from 'Wealthy' to 'The Lowest Class' as follows:-

KEY
	Wealthy (three or more servants; houses rated £100 or more)
	Well to do (one or two servants)
	Working class comfort
	Comfort mixed with poverty
	Standard poverty
	Very poor
	The lowest grade

The Key to the Booth Poverty Map

How the Booth Survey was Compiled

Information for the map was collected by teams of people, including people like the Duckworths (Virginia Woolf’s half brother and half sister) and Beatrice Potter, who married Sidney Web and helpd to form the London School of Economics where the Booth files are now housed. Booth’s helpers included some of the most lively and vociferous people in the country. They interviewed the local clergy, police, teachers, and others with particular knowledge of the local areas. One of the main sources of information was the School Board Visitors. Their original qualification had been the ability to run faster than the children, and so catch truants, but they became far more than that. Many of the Visitors worked in the same area for a number of years, so their knowledge of individual families, the fathers’ occupations, family income, etc. was unrivalled . It was their duty to visit every house in every street and make notes on each family with children of school age. They began a few years before the children reached school age and continued until the last child in the family had left.

The Collection of Booth material, which is stored at London School of Economics, includes 392 note-books of house to house surveys, 55 volumes including records of interviews, and 6 boxes of 25' O. S. maps hand coloured to show degrees of poverty. The seventeen volume survey analyzed this material, but the original notebooks, terse and immediate, are sharp and alive. Quick notes written on the hoof as raw material for more ponderous sentences later, but worth reading in their own right.

The interviewers made reports which have been published by London School of Economics on their splendid website.

The Booth Map of 1889

The Upper Holloway section of the section of the Booth shows a mainly prosperous area of Red houses. Along the main roads These ‘Well to do’ families, with one or two servants living in, would have been the owners of factories, solicitors, lawyers, business men, who were moving out of Central London to the countryside. Their families could live in the fresh air, while the father went into the polluted city to make a living each day. The main roads were lined with Red. Around the St Paul’s area there were Pink houses showing Working Class Comfort. Thee were the foremen and skilled craftsmen, what Booth called ‘the non-commissioned officers of the industrial army’. Three roads are in Light Blue – Standard Poverty and Dark Blue – Very Poor. No roads were marked Black – The lowest grade.

When the first set of Booth maps were published on 1899 they caused a furore. People were shocked at the scale of the housing problem and how close unhealthy, verminous houses were to their own back doors. People who came into their own houses as workmen and servants, were living in conditions not fit for animals. These were dangerous centres of infection which could affect everyone. Besides concern and pity for others, there was a fear for thir own health. This was a society reading about Pasteur and first learning about how disease is spread and here was danger at their doorsteps.

Councils get Permission to Build To Let

It was clear that 5% Philanthropy could not tackle the massive problems revealed by Booth's study of London Housing.

It was no coincidence that in 1890, only a year after the first Booth Maps were published, that Parliament became disenchanted with the existing system.. It was clear that 5% Philanthropy could not tackle the massive problems revealed by Booth's study of London Housing, so Parliament gave Local Authorities the right to ‘Build and Let’. This was the start of Municipal Housing.

Councils could now build housing in blocks, or as cottages where there was space for them, and let it at low rents to poor people. To do this they could borrow money at low interest over 60 years. This is a very long time. Most people wanted to lend for shorter periods at much higher interest, but this money was safe because it was backed by the government. The money could not be lost unless the government itself went bankrupt, so people were prepared to lend this money at low interest for the sake of security. This cheap, long-term money was the start of Municipal Housing and led to a flurry of activity among Local Authorities.

The problem now was to find cheap building sites in city centres within easy distance of people’s work. Well off people wanted to move to the edge of town, so land prices were high there. Good sites in the centre were far too expensive for Councils to buy. The patch of Blue in Upper Holloway consisted of old, overcrowded and unhealthy properties already occupied by people who could afford no better. The Council began to buy up these houses in bits and pieces and gradually put together a possible site.

The Site of Wedmore Estate in 1894–6

++COLOUR IN THE CLEARED AREA ONLY

The Area in 1915

The front houses in Wedmore Street have been cleared away and the block built surrounded on all sides by older houses.

++COLOUR IN THE BUILT BLOCKS

The Area in 1955

++could not tackle the massive problems revealed by Booth's study of London Housing. It was no coincidence that in 1890, only a year after the first Booth Maps were published, that Parliament became disenchanted with the ‘5 %. Philanthropic’ method of approaching housing for the poor and gave Local Authorities the right to Build and Let. This was the start of Municipal Housing.

Local Authorities were given the powers to build houses to be rented in 1890, but it was not easy to find building sites in overcrowded areas. The need was great but it was ten years before Islington managed to find space to start its first estate and only found that in dribs and drabs.

Five Per Cent Philanthropic Housing

As London and other cities grew larger, their housing for poor people became a scandal. More and more newcomers tried to squeeze into the limited accommodation. Houses were divided into floors and single rooms. There were cases of whole families living in one room and even of different families living in different corners of a single room. Landlords put up sub-standard buildings over gardens, packed so closely that some rooms had no windows, light, or air. Apart from anything else ,this was a threat to their health and to better--off people living nearby.

Well-meaning, charitable people began to invest some of their money into housing people at low rents - the so called 'Five per cent Housing'. They did not expect high returns on their money, but they certainly required some. This philanthropic system had rehoused a number of people, but not enough to tackle the problem.

Earliier legislation had attempted to house the poorer people by charitable and philanthropic means - the so called 'Five per cent. housing' - in which people with charitable intentions invested money in Housing Societies to build property to be rented out at low rents. They did not expect high returns on their money, but; they certainly required some. This philanthropic system had rehoused a number of people, but. could not tackle the massive problems revealed by Booth's study of London Housing. It was no coincidence that in 1890, only a year after the first Booth Maps were published, that Parliament became disenchanted with the ‘5 %. Philanthropic’ method of approaching housing for the poor and gave Local Authorities the right to Build and Let. This was the start of Municipal Housing.

How The Booth Survey was Compiled

The information was collected by teams of people who interviewed the local clergy, police, teachers, and others with particular knowledge of the local areas. One of the main sources of information was the School Board Visitors. Their original qualification had been the ability to run faster than the children, and so catch truants, but they became far more than that. Many of the Visitors worked in the same area for a number of years, so their knowledge of individual families, the fathers’ occupations, family income, etc. was unrivalled .

It was their duty to visit every house in every street and make notes on each family with children of school age. They began a few years before the children reached school age and continued until the last child in the family had left.

The Collection of Booth material, which is stored at London School of Economics, includes 392 note-books of house to house surveys, 55 volumes including records of interviews, and 6 boxes of 25' O. S. maps hand coloured to show degrees of poverty. The seventeen volume survey analyzed this material, but the original notebooks, terse and immediate, are sharp and alive. Quick notes written on the hoof as raw material for more ponderous sentences later, but worth reading in their own right.

The interviewers made reports which have been published by London School of Economics on their splendid website.

1894 - 96 map of the future Wedmore Estate site

By this time alnost there were few spaces left in the Holloway neighbourhood. The London County Council searched for a long time and it was 10 years before they found the first Holloway site. The area was adjoining an area of Poverty, marked in blue on the Booth map above.

The First Three Blocks - 1900 -1904

On 11th December 1900, the London County Council decided to purchase a site in Wedmore Street, Holloway, under Part III of The Housing of the Working Classes Act, 1890.

This file is an example of how the L.C.C. tackled its new responsibility.The houses flrst mentioned in the minutes were the odd numbers from 39 to 47 Wedmore Street, but clearly the Council had plans to buy more than these few. The total sum available for the site and for the three blocks of dwellings to be built on it, was £62.460. By April.1901 the site had been purchased and the freehold was obtained in May, for a total sum of £11, 650.

Work proceeded and in December 1902 the Council was offered two more houses, Nos. 40 and 51, by W. J. Ramsay & Co, of the Phoenix Estate Office, 457 Holloway Road. The Architect prepared a plan for the Nos 39 ‑ 47 site and one for a larger site which would be made possible if the two extra houses were purchased and included in the scheme. In the second case, 296 persons could be accommodated. In November the Council voted £250 for preliminary site work, including making trial holes to examine the subsoil.

In January 190;3, the Council reported that they had made an ex‑gratia payment of £5 to the tenant of No 2 Wedmore Street for giving them vacant possession. Ramsay & Co now offered Nos, 11‑17 (odd). Gradually the council was accumulating a larger site.

On 10th February, 1903, W. E. Ri1ey, the Superintending Architect, presented the working drawings, bills of quantity, and the estimate for the two front blocks of Wessex Buildings. In 1931 these were renamed as Weatherbury and Norcombe, but at that time they were called blocks A and B. The Architect asked what proportion of the total money available could be applied to these two blocks. The Housing Manager replied dividing the money as follows:

In February the Architect and the Housing Manager both reported on the scheme and in April, the Works Committee accepted the architect‘s estimate. 1n December the Architect reported the views of Islington Borough Council on the Wedmore Street Buildings. Presumably they must have been favourable as the Islington Council requested to be allowed to supply the buildings with electric light. (At this period, years before the National Grid was created, Local Authorities had their own Electricuty and Gas Companies and Islington Borough Council was the obvious supplier of electricity).

The Cost of Building

On the 25th. of February 1903, the Housing Committee was given the following projected figures:

The estimate for the Back Block of Wessex buildings, now called Melchester, were: as follows.

Saving Money on Future Maintenance

In February 1903, the Valuer's original calculations had to be altered because the District Rates had been increased from 6 shillings in the pound to 7 shillings and two pence halfpenny, and lncome Tax had risen from 1 shilling. to 1 shilling and 3 pence. in the pound. These rises would have put up the necessary rents. On the other hand, the improved standard of building which the Architect was proposing would reduce the costs of future repairs.

Changes in the construction

All the internal woodwork was to be grained and varnished instead of painted. This would require complete revarnishing only twice in the whole sixty years which the building would take to pay for, and mere washing and touching up in between. All door and window furniture would be substantial and long lasting; sash windows, not casements, were to be used; the stair­cases to the blocks would have a dado of glazed brick, while the outside of the building itself, would have a glazed dado to a height. of four feet., with all angles finished with bull nosed bricks for safety.

Because of the expected reduction in maintenace, the estimate ref expenditure on repairs and renewals could be reduced from 13% to 10%.

Financing the Development
Changes in Finance affect the whole project.

23rd May,1903

The Housing of the Working Classes Act, Part III, provided that no charge should be placed on the county rate, so extra costs could not be passed on.

In 1890, the Council had calculated that, with interest at 3%, there would be. a modest, annual surplus of £47. 16. 8d. By 1903 interest had risen to 3 ¼ % which would turn this surplus into a deficit. of £53, 13s. 4d. This could be met by saving in construction, but the rise in interest and income tax rate. and in the District Rates, was to reduce the total. amount. available for the project from £62, 460 to £60, 987. About £1, 500 had been lopped off' the project by events totally outside the control of the L. C. C. or the Arcitect. This is a very simple example of what happens to projects all. the time and which, in many cases, can lead to bankruptcy.

These figures have been included to show how Local Authorities had to plan and look far ahead in financing theseprojects.

In January 1904, Nos 2‑18r Wedmore Street were demolished, in preparation for the Third Block. The necessary shoring and boarding work was carried out by the Council for £59, 10s. 6d. but the sale of‑ old materials for £47, 3s. 6d. almost. paid for it: (This illustrates how closely the figures were checked).

In June 1904, £300 was allocated for the preparation of working drawings for the Back Block and rents for all three blocks were fixed as follows: -

This gave a total rental income of £1,3200 16s, less any losses on empty properties etc., but figures were changing all the time.

Interest was at 3 ½ % by this time, while interest on the Sinking Fund was at 2½%.

In July the Finance Committee was still considering what: to do about funding the building. The 1900 calculations were already out of date. Iinterest had risen in 1901 to 3 ¼ %, to 3 ½ % in 1903, and to 3 ½ °% in 1904. This gave an annual deficiency of £60. ls. 11d. on the Back Block alone and £108 on the three together.

The Sinking Fund, formed by setting aside income from the rents to accumulate at interest to pay off the cost of the building, was :invested at 2 ½ %. If the Sinking Fund could be invested at 3i% instead, the estimated annual deficiency would be reduced to about £60. The Finance Committee considered appealing to the Treasury for permission to do this, The records do not. show if they were successful.

Building by Direct Labour

By Oc.tober 1904 the front two blocks were nearing completion and would provide accommodation for 710 persons. The third block, which would house 340, was to be built. in a different manner. The increase of interest rate had affected the amount available so that only £15.037 could be spent. The Committee decided that the Third Block should be erected at the prices adopted for the earlier ones, but 'without the intervention of a ccntractor', which means by direct labour,iIn order to to save the Contractor's profit. On 18th July 1904, an amendment, to reverse this decision and to have the work, done by private contractors, was defeated by 75 votes to 44, so the Council was split on the idea.

This very detailed account of how the first Islington blocks were built, reveals how each contract has its own running problems and how outside influences impact on any actual building. It shows why ‘an architect has to have two pairs of eyes and wings on his feet’ if he is to bring a building to a successful conclusion.

The site of Wedmore Estate in 1894–6

The Area in 1915

End of Part 1

Part 2
Part 3

Main Menu

Revised: October 25, 2011 8:31 AM